The new face of Middle East
I. Introduction
As we know, in few times has been held a big set of changes in middle east country state leaders. Syria’s government got protest from its own civilians, Libya’s Qaddafi being attacked by UN’s forces due to set Qaddafi down as protestant wants, Egypt’s government fall, Emirates Arab aware of protest that made big changes held on its region. Who is in smiling position when look this accident? It is Israel which writer predict that Israel’s Intelligent “Mossad” works behind the scene due to remake the map of Middle east “Arab League” which always be the main rivals for Israel’s great plan, it is to create “Great Israel” which they said that Israel will get the territory just like David and Solomon’s Kingdom in the past. It is from Egypt (Nil river) across to Eufrat river in Iraq and it is symbolize on Israel’s Flag with star David between two line. That is why I write this essay titled “The new face of Middle East” which can we read with Theory of conspiracy as “The new settled government of Middle East by Israel to make their dream create The Great Israel easier”. This is all what the writer what to share about.
II. Main Idea
· Who is in good position in this phenomena that happened in Middle East?
· What is really happened in Middle East with international politics points of view?
That questions is the main purpose why The writer take this theme and title then try to describe what “the hell” happened in Middle East which known as The place of Oil, the greatest region of Muslim (Islam) peoples and the place where a state named Israel exist. And this essay want to find Who is take the profit in these case. Hopefully this essay could explain what exactly happened in the case of Middle East.
III. Research Method
In this essay, writer take “ The Theory of Conspiracy” as the method to explain and read what happened in Middle East according to the revolution of Middle East recently.
Conspiracy theory or conspiracy theories are theories that try to explain that the ultimate cause of one or a series of events (usually political events, social, or historical) is a secret, and often deceptive, secretly planned stationary by a secret group of people or organizations that are very powerful or influential. Many conspiracy theories claim that major events in history have been dominated by the conspirators behind the scenes who manipulate political events. This theory is in motion about global world and penetrated almost all aspects of human life. From politics even food[1].
With Conspiracy theories, writer collect all fact, documents, books, news, and few thinker’s arguments about what happened in Middle East and the links with Israel provit in conspiracy theories calculation. Writer get the information from website on the internet, newspaper, hot news, books, and all kind of information that can help to complete these essay.
IV. Contents research
A massive change is occurring throughout the Middle East and it is far from clear how the geo-political world will look once the dust has settled. Furthermore, in a region so rich in oil and yet so poor in democratic process or infrastructure, the western world is right to wonder what will be the outcome of these revolutions - democratization for long suffering peoples or further radicalization?3
It is clear why the revolutions are taking place. Organized and carried out mainly by a large majority of young people who feel frustrated at lack of job security, social safety nets, basic freedoms of speech and movement as well as a lack of the dignity of clear governance, the people have finally had enough. What is not clear however is where these revolutions are headed and to what end. What is more, although these revolutions have been primarily inward facing, the concerns in Israel for how this will affect her, despite Israel's general long held belief that a democratic Middle East will improve prospects for peace and stability in the region, are strong.
The first major revolution we saw, shortly after Tunisia, was in Egypt. After 30 years of rule by Mubarak, the 80m strong Egyptian people finally stood up and hit back. Egypt however, a bastion of stability and a 'Moderate' leader in the region, is seen by Israel to be a taste case for the others to come. Sharing a 150 mile border with Israel across the Sinai, Egypt is at the heart of the Arab world and is traditionally the sign of emerging trends, as the birthplace of the authoritarian military rule, Pan-Arabism Islam and now the revolt against dictatorship. After the 1973 Yom Kippur War, supporting strongly by the US, Egypt lead the way in the signing of Peace Treaties with Israel that was shortly followed by a treaty with Jordan, both of which have stood the test of time and removed the threat of war between Israel and the strongest Arab military force[2].
Despite the military forces who have taken over the interim governance of Egypt following the ousting of Mubarak in January, Israelis still have reason for concern as to what lies ahead for the future of its peace treaty with Egypt. For one, although the peace treaty was kept in spirit, it was far from taken on board by the Egyptian people. One thing this revolution has called into question indeed is that peace treaties can be made with governments but to really be considered solid they need to also be made with the people themselves. As Egypt took a strong position in coordinating Israeli-Palestinian relations, security and the peace process, the new regime may well look differently upon this. Whether the new government feels the same is very much up in the air.
Secondly, there is already a dangerous deterioration of security in the Sinai with the Egyptian police not monitoring the activities going on there as much as they did under Mubarak. Indeed, there has already been a sabotage on February 5th on the Egypt-Jordan natural gas pipeline with delays in it being re-installed (suggesting the delays were of a political nature as well as logistical) as well as attempted attacks on the gas pipeline that supplies gas from Egypt to Israel. This calls into question the future of commercial and business considerations between Israel and Egypt that will be determined by Egypt's foreign policy.
So, what does this mean for the West and the International community as a whole? Although the US and Europe could not control much of what happened during the revolution itself, they can however have a major impact on what happens following it. With the US already supplying large amounts of military aid to Egypt, it should be looking, along with Europe due to its own economic deficit, to provide Egypt with the necessary tools to build its democratic infrastructure and institutions. The EU is in a good position to improve and upgrade its commitments to Egypt in economic reform and investments as already laid out in the EU-Egypt Action Plan of 2007[3].
In the wider context the revolution in Egypt took place at a time of weakening of te pragmatic Arab leadership lead by Egypt and Saudi Arabia as well as Jordan and the Palestinian Authority with many splits dividing their strength and unity against the more radical Shiite entity of Iran. Furthermore, there is an increasingly prominent view of the US's weakness in the region with regards to its influence and power.
In its place, the void was filled by more radical forces such as Iran, as is currently being seen in Iraq as the Americans come closer to withdrawing in the not too distant future, as well as on-the-fence states such as Turkey, Qatar and Syria who have positioned themselves as in-betweens and hold much influence in the region enabling them to play one side off against the other.
In order to not allow these more pragmatic and moderate regimes, such as Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to fall, the international community needs to show more support and involvement in bolstering them and their governments to ensure revolution does not break out there too. Furthermore, the west needs to get more involved in the transition process in general in those countries which are currently going through dramatic change.
As we watch the events in Libya unfold, it is crucial that the international community does not allow Qaddafi's forces to win the battle for this will surely dishearten other potential revolutions that are boiling in places like Syria and even Iran. In contrast, autocratic rulers will interpret Qaddafi's victory as evidence that the only way to suppress such potential revolutions is with violent and brute force in the knowledge that the West will unlikely intervene in fear of another failure.
As for the Peace process, there is strong debate in Israel over whether now is the time for renewal of it and trying to bring it back to life or to wait until the regional pieces of the jigsaw have fallen into place and they know who is who. The concern of starting the process again is whether there is enough stability to ensure that any potential agreement is sustainable.
Israeli PM, Netanyahu seems to have finally decided that the former option is more favorable as waiting for the regional outcome entails too much risk. To further delay the renewal of the process is only likely to encourage frustration from the Palestinians and strengthen the calls for self-declaration of a Palestinian State and the isolation of Israel in the public arena. In addition, with the current wave of uprisings taking place in the region, Palestinians may well be encouraged to undertake another popular uprising/Intifada and lead to further escalation and move away from the more pragmatic approach of round the table talks[4].
The EU should seize on this opportunity to support the Palestinians in bringing them back to the table and setting agreed upon parameters upon which the talks can take place. At the same time they need to continue the good work done by Palestinian Prime Minister Fayed in the West Bank of institution building.
It may also be wise to revisit the Syrian peace track and lure it away from the grips of Iran to balance out the shaky balance of power. In turn this would cool down the relations it has with Hezbollah and bring it closer towards the moderate camp.
To say the relationship between Obama and Mubarak since the beginning of ice-cold, it is no exaggeration. Mubarak staunchly opposed Obama's policies toward Iran and how Washington reacts to Tehran's nuclear program, Obama's policies toward the Persian Gulf countries, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine. He is a formidable thorn in Washington's larger agenda for the entire region, Greater Middle East Project, which recently heard as the "New Middle East."[5]
The strategy has been recorded in various files Department of Foreign Affairs and the Pentagon at least a decade or more. After George W. Bush announced the War on Terror in 2001, the strategy called the Greater Middle East Project. Today known as the "New Middle East / New Middle East," a term that sounds more smooth and non-threatening. This is a strategy to break the countries in the region ranging from Morocco to Afghanistan, the region defined by the David Rockefeller friend Samuel Huntington's famous essay The Clash of Civilizations, as the New Middle East in his essay in Foreign Affairs magazine.
"The United States claimed to be interested in the wider democratization in the Arab world, especially since the September 2001 attacks by terrorists from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Lebanon. These interests have become part of an effort to reduce political violence, destabilization and terrorism. Thou who noted President George W. Bush in a speech in 2003 for the National Endowment for Democracy, "As long as the Middle East remains a place where freedom does not develop, it will remain a place of stagnation, resentment, and ready to export violence" (White House, 2003)[6]. United States has used various means to instill democracy, including the military intervention which, although launched for other reasons, will manifest themselves in the establishment of democratic governance as one of the final destination. However, indigenous reform movement is the best placement for democratization in their own country. "
Hidden Role of Israel in the Middle East Conflict
No half-hearted, they are armed in a massive scale up to reach 1.5 billion dollars just to bring down the regime in power in Mogadishu. Even until 2010, the President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai and his national security team to support the American-backed plan for Israeli lobby to establish local police forces across the country.
Even in Egypt without being noticed a lot of people, Tel Aviv recorded many times in the contact list by Hosni Mubarak and asked him to resign by transferring the reins of leadership under the control of the military. However, developing overdo opinion, Israel does not seem to be involved too much. Anyone who preach pragmatism Israel in the fall of Mubarak? CNN, AFP, Reuters? Nothing at all.
In the oil interests in Libya, for example, who is busy arranging the oil here? Or Israel? Precisely then the United States that impose unilateral sanctions against 14 companies of Libya, which is owned by the Libyan National Oil Company which became the major oil company owned by the government and the main financial purse for the Qaddafi regime.
Who are later very busy the whole affair and finish off Gaddafi's Libya? Israel? The leaders of the United States, Britain and France who then conduct telephone conversations to agree that NATO should take a leading role in military operations in Libya.
Imagine that closed Israel's role there. As if Israel did not want to contribute minimum if called at all in the conflict between Qaddafi with the Allies. Though Israel is very concerned on the issue of Libya, Libya is in his scenario that would strengthen Israel's defense base to finalize their plans over the Middle East Geopolitics base.
With globalize Zionist interests of Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Al Jazzier, Somalia, and Sudan, will strengthen Israel's economic power lines and automatically establish a new world order is increasingly hegemony. Israel also will clamp the Palestinian position in power that have not done Qaddafi, Qaddafi despite also not the same as Egyptian demeanor that silent and most support the strengthening of the Palestinian position on Israel.
Concrete evidence had long ago done by Israel to lobby the U.S. to attack and supporting the rebels Libya. One of them, played by U.S. senators, Joseph Lieberman, a Jewish lobby actor, who wrote a resolution for the United States recognized the board of the Libyan rebels as the legitimate government of France as he had done.
Israel Will Play in Two Position For Muslims Weakening
Then where is Israel's role here? Let's not easy to be fooled when looking at Israel are supporting the coalition forces against the Qaddafi government. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, said to have held a tripartite meeting on February 18 and resulted in the decision to recruit African mercenary troops for joint pro-Qaddafi of Libya against the demonstrators.
In the analysis of the author, this is done in two interests. First Israel was not intended to support the Qaddafi regime, but merely aims to provoke them among fellow Muslims in Libya. Why is this done? We'll go on a second opinion, because Israel knew perfectly well a Muslim militia forces would be potentially leads Libya after Qaddafi collapsed. Libya is a Middle Eastern country that potentially created bases mujahedeen against the hegemony of Israel. It is also not counted among the nationalist uprising that was put hatred against Zionism.
In the meeting it was reported also that Israeli officials approved a request from General Yisrael Ziv, a director at security consultant who operates in many African countries, to develop its military forces payment from Guinea, Nigeria, Chad, Mali, Senegal, Republic of central Africa and the rebels Darfur and Southern Sudan.
V. Conclusions
To conclude, the current level of instability in the Middle East makes the stakes way too high for the international community to ignore and simply let the chips fall where they may. The outcome of these revolutions will determine the world's geo-political scene for Middle East, and when these fact and way of think featured to what is going on recently in Middle East, we will find that Israel with all their plan want to change the geo-politics of Middle East and make the new government one as “ The New Face of Middle East” and made to help their goals.
VI. Bibliography and References
Ø Piper Michael Collins, The new Jerusalem ( Jerusalem Baru), kekuatan zionis di amerika, planet buku, 2008.
Ø Mustofiah Dewi,Dahsyatnya Lobi – lobi Israel, IRCiSoD, Yogyakarta 2011.
Ø Nurdi Herry,Membongkar rancana Israel Raya, Cakrawala, Jakara 2009
Ø Maheswara Aria, Rahasia Kecerdasan Yahudi, Pinus, Yogyakarta 2008.
Ø Jessup Philip c., Behind Israel's Freedom and other state after World War II,Columbia University Press, New York 1974
Komentar